Canada’s Innovation Policy Agenda Just Doesn’t Do It
As Canada’s Innovation advocacy Group, CATAAlliance, moderates crowdsourced ideas and guidance from over 800,000 opt-in members with strong Canadian interests. Their commentary provides direction for our efforts to promote positive changes that can provide Canada’s innovation based businesses the environment they need to compete and grow effectively.
Ultimately, our role is advocate for the changes needed to maximize the return on Canadians’ significant investments in science and technology through its commercialization by Canadians. The guidance we’re receiving tells us that there’s lots of room for improvement.
The creation of Canadian super clusters is a good first step to advancing Canada’s competitive innovation ranking, but stops short in having measurable outcomes. And recent NAFTA negotiations continue to keep the door open to Canada’s largest market and trading partner, the U.S., another important success.
Despite these positive steps, the government’s three-year effort to rationalize spending in a more innovative support system for S&T (Science and Technology) and to create a modern IP (Intellectual Property) regime does not address the perennial and key issue.
Specifically, tech leaders have argued – for close to a decade – that the critical challenge facing federal governments is how to significantly improve the return on Canadian Taxpayers’ investments in S&T linked business innovation. In our experience, the Liberals are not the first federal government to have ignored this critical issue as they developed their respective innovation agendas with limited prioritization given to what happens to the IP.
While we have not seen a careful analysis of the cost of the outflow of Canadian innovations from Canada in terms of a net benefit analysis, their impacts cannot be small. We believe that a financial audit is needed to put the issue into perspective.
Throughout work with the Conservative Government, CATA highlighted the need for better returns on our investments. Specifically, we argued that it is not the lack of Canadian S&T successes, creativity and innovations that are the problem. Rather, it is our governments’ failures to support the exploitation of the country’s successes to the fullest benefit of Canadians. We have carried forward the same message to the current Government.
Governments do not seem to grasp that a continued simplistic focus on throwing money at S&T support – either through academia or directly to businesses in the form of SR&ED (Scientific Research and Experimental Development) tax credits, grants, etc. – simply leads to the off shoring of the IP rewards for other countries to exploit?
So far, we have not seen the federal bureaucracy show much interest. On the other hand, the importance of the issue has been picked up in a spate of well-developed articles/Op-Eds, some offering ideas on what is needed.
CATA’s position is that it’s time for this Government to demonstrate true innovation leadership. Our call to action to all party leaders is to embrace 5 points:
All parties should embrace this guidance in election platforms. It will bring us much closer to having a system of innovation in which government, universities and the private sector work more closely together to move from invention to commercially viable solutions. This will not only create jobs, retain our talent in Canada, but also provide more solid returns to Canadians.
Co Authors: John Reid, CEO, CATAAlliance & Russ Roberts, Sr. VP Advocacy, CATAAlliance
The Canadian Advanced Technology Alliance (CATAAlliance), Canada’s One Voice for Innovation Lobby Group, crowdsources ideas and guidance from thousands of opt in members in moderated social networks in Canada and key global markets. Supported by evidence-based research, CATAAlliance then mobilizes the community behind public policy recommendations designed to boost Canada’s innovation and competitiveness success.